Today I went with A Person to Be Pseudonymed Later to see Rear Window and A Man in the Dark (1953) (which was the first 3-D film from a major studio).

Rear Window is a classic for a reason -- it is a tightly written suspense story with engaging characters that use the constrained setting (one room of an apartment and the surrounding apartments as they can be seen from the rear window) to great effect.

A Man in the Dark is entertaining for a b-movie film noir. The best part of it is the ending set on amusement pier (and thus a chase and fight on rollercoaster tracks) and the insurance investigator who is the smartest person in the movie.
Last night, my friends ([personal profile] greenygal, A Person to be Psuedonymed Later, and the Vegan Knitter) went to see The Devil Rides Out as part of the Christopher Lee centennial film series.

It was a lot of fun, being a Hammer film made in 1968 and set in 1929. It took a while for me to realize it was set in the 1920s, because the men's suits were that distinctively of the time, and the Duc (Christopher Lee's character, playing a hero for once) seems the sort of guy who have a collection of fancy antique cars.

But when he mentioned that he and his friend Rex were in the Lafayette Escadrille with Simon's father (Simon being their young friend who has gotten entangled with Satanists!), I went ?!

It's actually quite a fun movie, though every time Christopher Lee's character has to leave his companions alone to go do something, they make the dumbest choices -- partly because if he was there, he wouldn't let the other characters pick up the idiot ball.

The villian Mocata -- who because I'm familiar with British accents drops I had assumed was named McCarthy until the end credits -- was a charismatic cult leader and black magician. You can really see where the story was cribbing from early 20th century esotericism and where it was just making stuff up; Christopher Lee got to have fun as an occult expert and white magician who was going to get every one safe through this even if he had to thump them all into line himself.

The practical effects were good for the time, but look a bit amateurish now. However, the scene where the Angel of Death comes for our heroes actually had a horse ridden into the building and was actually quite spectacular.

There was also a very unconvincing romance, but that happened a lot in movies of the era.

I did wonder how the villain thought he was going to *control* the Angel of Death, considering that angels are an enter order of magnitude different from people, but I guess when you're a black magician leading your own cult and capable of summoning Baphomet, you think you can handle an angel. You can't, by the way. The ending is really clear about that.

Anyway, if have an opportunity to see it, take it. It's fun!

I might even request if for Yuletide.
Last night, A Person to Be Pseudonymed Later and I went to the Noir City DC festival and attended a screening of The Killer Who Stalked New York (1950).

The basic premise is that a woman, who being pursued by Customs Officers because she's smuggling stolen diamonds, comes back from a trip to Cuba. She comes back to her husband, who is also involved in the diamond smuggling, and unbeknownst to her he's having an affair with her sister. Unbeknowst to everyone, she's picked up smallpox. She evades the Customs Officers persueing her, but winds up sick on the street and is taken to a public health clinic, where the doctor misdiagnosis her, though not before she interacts with a child in the waiting room.

The movie is pretty heavy-handed, and some of the "it's so frustrating that we can't beat this even with all the modern medical technology of 1947!" is more than a little awkward in retrospective, but it's definitely a good attempt to tell a noir story with an interesting twist. The vaccination effort running into supply shortages was also a nice touch, though the mayor telling the vaccine manufacturing executives to break regulations in order to get more vaccine made had me rolling my eyes; FDA safety regulations were only 9 years old at the time, and no one in the pharmaceutical industry would have been ignorant of why they existed. The idea that you could get a sewing machine company to make smallpox innocculation needles was also Hollywood Logic at its finest.

The movies suffers a little bit because the make-up technology of the time isn't up to producing a convincing smallpox rash -- the main character does manage to look ill, through pasty, unflattering make-up, but none of the other characters who fall ill show any sign of the characteristic rash. The only time there's convincing smallpox on the screen is the scene in the military lab with a high-powered microscope, and I'm pretty sure the actor who said "if you survive, you wind up looking like this" was actually a smallpox survivor, because that pebbly skin texture would have been impossible for the movie make-up of the time.

Still, it was pretty obvious why the Noir Foundation put this movie on the roster, and I did enjoy it a lot.
I went to see On The Town today, as the local arthouse is celebrating Leonard Bernstein’s centennial.

It was a lot of fun, though the museum dance sequence did not age well -- the dancing itself was fine, but the costuming and drums were pretty racist.

Otoh, it was quite hilarious to see how the two sailors not played by Gene Kelly (meaning Jules Munshin and Frank Sinatra (playing a naive young sailor, wtf?)) were basically scooped up by their respective girls immediately and decidely.

I mean, when Claire (who is studying anthropology to get over her obsession with men; ‘is it working?’ ‘almost’) dips Ozzie into a kiss, that’s when the others show up to find them in a clinch, and Hildy the cab driver (who insisted Sinatra’s Chip sit next to her before she’d drive the others around) first line of dialogue to Claire is:

“Dr. Kinsey, I presume?”

This movie came out in 1949. Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male in 1948. No one in the original audience would have missed that joke.

Also, Claire first notices Ozzie because he’s standing next to a caveman reconstruction, and looks quite like it. So she spends the rest of the movie calling him ‘Specimen’ and he seems quite all right with it.

One thing I love about Gene Kelly movies (besides the singing and the amazing dancing) is that while his characters tend to have a hard edge to them, they are never dicks to women. Even though Gabe winds up with Hildy’s disaster of a roommate for a while, he turns her down gently at the end of the night *and* gives her a pep talk about her finding the right guy eventually. And when it turns out the girl he has been pursuing all day is not the high-society girl he thought she was, but an aspiring dancer making ends met at as a ‘cooch dancer’ at Coney Island he really doesn’t care, because he likes her for her.
Went to see Cat People (1942) as the AFI is showing all of Val Lewton's movies as the Val Lewton: Master of Macabre movie series for Halloween with [personal profile] greenygal and A (person to be pseydonymed later).

The movie has some truly stunning sequences, including a walk through the dark that ends with a bus pulling up while sounding like a screaming pather. You can really see techniques that came to define Noir in the film, including really gorgeous use of chiaroscuro lighting effects. And the scene at the pool allowed the secondary female character to be smart and displayed the terrifying uses of lighting and sound effects in the hands of someone who knew how to do a lot with minimal equipment.

We all wound up rooting for the death of the psychiatrist by halfway through the film, for being a boundary-violating creep. I don't know if any of that was accurate to acceptable practice of the day, but even his Dr. Van Helsing vibe couldn't get us to sympathize with him.

Also, Alan Napier made another appearance in a noir-ish film, and I'm beginning to wonder if I should make a spotter's list of all the actors who I recognize from other roles that show up in my vintage movies...
Nittany apples, potomac, magness, and bartlett pears, head of cabbage, celeriac, snacking peppers, and a chicken empanada.

I also picked up a quart of vegan mulligatawny soup, caramelized onion and mushroom sandwiches, and pretzel challah from Soupergirl! because [personal profile] fabrisse came over to watch movies with me. We got most of the way through Too Late for Tears before my DVD player started glitching. I think I may finally have to get a new one, as this one is literally decades old -- anyone have a recommendation for an affordable model I can get locally or get from Amazon?

I was hoping to have a watching party for Over the Garden Wall and other Halloween-themed media next weekend, but I'll have to see.

Also, I'm almost finished with [personal profile] fabrisse's Kraken Knuckles, and need to decide what to do next. Probably Anneal (I have some sparkly green yarn for it), but maybe the Wonder Woman wrap (knit? or crochet?), or maybe one of the Morehouse Merino critter scarfs for the Knit-Along (giant alligator? school of fish? pile of lab rats)?
I went to see The Killing (1956) on Wednesday by myself, and the double feature The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 (1974) and Charley Varrick with A (person to be pseudonymed later).

The Killing was excellent noir, full of chiascuro and dutch angles, with a tight tight script, including the final escape with the money being foiled by airline safety regulations!

For the double feature, Eddie Mueller, who hosts Noir Alley on Turner Classic Movies if you have that on cable, was there to introduce both movies. Since the theme of Noir City this year is "The Big Knockover: Heists, Hold-ups, and Schemes Gone Wrong", the Noir Foundation included several movies that are strictly speaking outside of the classic Noir genre, but are classics demonstrating the evolution of heist movies. Thus, we had 'Walter Matthau night' with the double feature.

The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 (1974) )

Charley Varrick )

And tonight, because I wanted to, I made Flemish Waffles from Everyone Eats Well In Belgium. I omitted the cognac, because making waffles taste of alcohol is pretty much a Do-Not-Want for me, but they were pretty tasty nevertheless, and I have a stack of waffles for breakfast for the week; I'm still getting used to my waffle iron, and it's a bit tricky to get it adjusted to be Just Crispy Enough. The waffle was especially good with the salted brown sugar peach jam I put up several weeks ago, and tomorrow I might try it with the rest of the black raspberry preserve I have open, or the pear compote. Maybe someday I'll get some pearl sugar and try the recipe for Leige waffles -- though I think I'd need a different waffle iron to actually get them perfectly right.
This weekend I've seen 4 movies as part of the Noir City DC film festival with [personal profile] greenygal. This year's theme: 'Heists, Hold-Ups, and Schemes Gone Wrong.'

Kansas City Confidential )

Criss-Cross )

The Asphalt Jungle )

White Heat )

I am amused that the solution in two of the movies to 'how do we make stolen money untraceable' is 'turn it in for the 25% reward from the insurance company covering the place we stole it from'. That's certainly an interesting way to launder ill-gotten gains.
Went to see Gaslight (1944) with A (person without a pseudonym) and [personal profile] greenygal; [personal profile] ellen_fremedon was supposed to join us, but the theater was sold out before she got there... for some reason, they were showing it in one of the smaller cinemas, instead of in the biggest one, which is at least twice as large and wouldn't have been as ridiculously sold out.

It was an excellent film, this print in 35 mm, and still completely relevant and at moments hard to watch. And it passes the Bechdel Test in the first 15 minutes! If you get a chance to see it on the big screen, it's definitely worth it.

This wasn't officially part of the Noir City DC film festival, but it was a nice run up to that. Next week is, though, and I might be seeing three movies next Saturday: Kansas City Confidential, Criss-Cross, and The Asphalt Jungle, with Sunday's White Heat a strong possibility as well.

I am definitely going to see the double-feature of The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 & Charley Varrick on Friday, October 20th, if anyone wants to join me.
.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags